Should Schools Replace Standardized Tests with Competency-Based Portfolios?
ALL BLOGSACADEMIC
For decades, standardized testing has been the dominant way to measure student achievement, from the SAT in the United States to the Gaokao in China. Supporters claim these exams provide an objective measure and a fair benchmark. But in today’s world, where problem-solving, creativity, and adaptability are essential, multiple-choice tests fall short. Competency-based portfolios, curated collections of student work that track growth and mastery over time, are emerging as one of the best alternatives to standardized testing. Yes, they take more time to evaluate, but research shows they offer a far more accurate and holistic picture of a student’s skills.
Here’s why schools should begin the shift: portfolios measure skills more effectively, support diverse learning styles, and foster deeper engagement, all while maintaining fairness and consistency.
The Limits of Standardized Testing
Standardized tests focus heavily on reliability, making sure results are consistent across administrations. But this often sacrifices validity. The National Research Council notes that most large-scale exams are designed for ranking students, not improving learning outcomes. As a result, students tend to memorize patterns and formulas rather than develop critical thinking. The World Economic Forum reports that while many can grasp basic concepts or solve equations, they struggle with open-ended problem-solving, research, and communicating complex ideas, exactly the skills needed in the 21st century.
What is Competency-Based Portfolio Assessment?
A portfolio-based assessment is a curated collection of a student’s work, essays, lab experiments, design projects, presentations, and performances, tied to specific competencies. Unlike a single high-stakes exam, portfolios provide a multi-dimensional view of student skills over time. Example: Vermont’s Proficiency-Based Graduation Requirement asks students to present a portfolio proving mastery in academic, civic, and transferable skills before graduating. The Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning and Equity (SCALE) found that well-structured portfolios not only measure higher-order thinking skills but also maintain high grading consistency when clear rubrics and training are used.
Why Portfolios Reflect Real-World Skill Measurement
In the professional world, hiring rarely depends on test scores. An architect is judged by their design portfolio, not a math test result. A journalist is valued for published articles, not a high school grammar exam. Rhode Island’s Diploma System prepares students in the same way, requiring portfolios that showcase problem-solving, communication, and reasoning skills. By the time they graduate, students have real examples they can use in college admissions or job interviews.
Supporting Diverse Learners
One of the most compelling reasons for adopting competency-based learning is its ability to showcase talents that standardized tests overlook. Students with language barriers, test anxiety, or disabilities often underperform on timed exams but excel in analytical or creative tasks. Portfolios allow these students to demonstrate mastery through multiple formats, writing, public speaking, visual design, coding, or physical performance.
A 2019 Learning Policy Institute study showed portfolio-based assessments reduce racial and socioeconomic performance gaps compared to traditional state testing averages.
Boosting Student Engagement and Deeper Learning
Portfolios encourage meaningful learning experiences over test prep. Harvard’s Project Zero found that students in portfolio-based schools show greater engagement, stronger critical thinking, and more self-reflection. In California’s Envision Education network, students defend their portfolios before panels of peers, teachers, and community members, building public speaking, reasoning, and self-assessment skills that last a lifetime.
Challenges of Portfolio-Based Assessment (and How to Solve Them)
Critics often raise concerns about:
Consistency: How do we ensure fair grading?
Teacher Workload: Will it become unmanageable?
College Admissions: Will portfolios be recognized equally?
These challenges are real but solvable:
Use clear rubrics, assessor training, and external moderation.
Leverage digital portfolio platforms like Mahara or Google Sites to streamline review and sharing.
Implement hybrid systems during transition, combining portfolio evaluations with standardized scores to ensure comparability.
And yes, standardized testing still has value for diagnosing learning needs and setting system-wide benchmarks. The question isn’t whether to abolish tests completely, it’s whether portfolios should be the primary method of student evaluation.
Steps Toward a Portfolio-Based Education System
Transitioning takes time, planning, and teacher training. States like Vermont, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island have proven it’s possible, though full implementation may take several years. Schools can start small, introducing portfolios in specific grades or subjects, collecting data on outcomes, and adjusting before scaling. Over time, as more evidence accumulates, policymakers can confidently move toward broader adoption.
Final Thoughts: A More Accurate Way to Evaluate Student Skills
In the 21st century, education must prepare students for complex problem-solving, adaptability, and lifelong learning. Competency-based portfolios do this by measuring what truly matters: skills, growth, and the ability to apply knowledge in real-world situations. The goal isn’t to eliminate standardized testing, but to balance it with portfolio-based assessment so students are evaluated fairly and holistically. It’s time education systems moved toward an approach that reflects the way the world works and prepares students for it.